Sunday, June 3, 2012

"The Millennials: The Dumbest Generation or the Next Great Generation?"

In the video, "The Millennials: The Dumbest Generation or the Next Great Generation," Mark Bauerlein and Neil Howe debate over if this rising generation is the dumbest generation or the greatest generation. Bauerlein states that high school and college years are crucial in brain development and thinking skills. Students will not have another time in their lives to devote to studying and fulfilling their intellectual desires. He claims that when we look at actual numbers, there is an intellectual decline in habits and achievements. Bauerlein believes that there has never been more of an opportunity for individuals to explore and satisfy these intellectual thoughts. This is due to an increase in libraries, colleges, museums, etc. However the big opportunity is the internet. Students can get any information they like with the click of a button. Instead of building knowledge foundation, it has become information retrieval. On the debating side, Neil Howe states that this youth is the smartest generation yet. He claims that testing is outdated and it does not enable students to show off their true intellect. According to data from the report card, math scores have increased, as well as the number of students who apply to take the SAT. Children are actually watching less TV than they used to, however they spend more time watching video games. Howe claims that this is not making students dumber. Many businesses now are actually using video games to train employees. Howe states that reading scores may have dropped because students have less free time to read. After watching this debate, I agree with viewpoints from both sides. In favor of the "dumbest generation", I do think that teachers in middle/high school need to place more emphasis on why school is important and how it is relevant to students' lives. There needs to become more of a purpose, and my fear is that standardized testing has pushed students to think that they are learning only to pass a test. I also believe that students have an amazing opportunity to learn whatever they wish, just at the touch of their fingertips. However, instead of "copy and pasting" information as Bauerlein states, teachers need to create ample opportunities for students to create and use the internet to foster that creativity. I agree with Howe that video games are not "making students dumber," but I do think it essential for parents to place a time limit on video game activity. The internet and video games are all part of a new generation. It is not making anyone dumber, but it may be restricting creativity. We should be using these resources to help us expand and satisfy student's desires to learn new information. I do not believe that reading scores have dropped due to less free time to read. I dedicate it to the fact that students are worn down on reading because it is pushed so hard in school and has taken on a negative connotation due to standardized testing. Students need to have a motivation to learn and see a purpose that is meaningful to them!

9 comments:

  1. Erin I really liked your point about how social media is restricting creativity. I know at the school I student taught at they are taking away a reading class and implementing another math class. It seems reading is becoming less and less important not only to the students but also to administration.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Erin I completely agree with you that standardized testing has really hurt students in wanting to learn and teachers teaching for their students to really grasp the materials. With so much importance on standardized testing and reading scores, students are drawing away from wanting to continue to read outside of school and concentrate on other things. I also agree with technology hindering creativity but I do think it opens up the door to a new type of creativity in terms of setting up blogs or creating websites based off personal interests.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I completely agree that is was tough to side with one argument or the other. Your statement about teachers creating instead of copying and pasting is great. I know you and I have both seen how teachers get caught up in habit and routine. We need to find a strong way to implement reading and technology together at home.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I do not understand how anyone can believe that technology is hindering creativity. Social media allows a person to create a persona, someone they wish they could be or want to share with the world. In essence, by creating a profile and developing a story to go with this persona, he or she is engaging in creative writing. What about graphic designers, or, more specifically, those working in the special effects industry? They solely rely on technology to create some of the greatest visuals ever seen. YouTube videos created by our students are definitely a form of creativity. Our students are creative through the use of technology, but they are still being judged using the "traditional standards of communication".

    ReplyDelete
  5. Erin, you hit the nail on the head: That's exactly what students think about standardized testing. The fun has been sucked out of reading at the high school level because students have to master the State Performance Indicators that will be tested on their class End of Course exams. The results are worth 25% of their final grades. Students could care less about individual novels; they want to pass the EOC. And now, half of a teacher's evaluation score is based on those same EOCs. Is it too much? Are those scores a fair indication of what a student learned, or what a teacher successfully taught? I don't think so. How do we impress upon students that literature is also important?

    ReplyDelete
  6. I liked your comments about standardized tesing. Even in third grade, which is what I teach, they were worried about not passing the TCAPS to move on to fourth grade. It was really sad to see and feel the tense atmosphere leading up to that week, even when not much was said about it. Also, reading is such a touchy subject due to the fact that if students can't find anything that interests them, they are not going to read anything.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I agree that teachers should be able to state why school is important…in fact, I believe they should be able to state why each lesson they are teaching is important and relevant to the students’ lives, or they should not teach that lesson.

    I don’t know if students are worn down on reading because it’s pushed so hard. I hope reading is pushed hard…but I hope those students get a choice of what they are pushed to read. I think that’s really why kids hate reading…they’re forced to read stuff that isn’t interesting to them.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I also think that students do not regard what they do as reading so much because of how reading gets defined and pushed upon them in school. Reading is not just getting information to answer a question and it is not just something you do because it is good for you. It has lots of aspects, not just ones we push for academic reasons.
    Reading is something you do because it gets you something you want or helps you do something you need to do. People forget that, and then weird things happen in school. I thought we supposed to be preparing students for life, not for more school...

    ReplyDelete
  9. I think you were the first person to bring up standardized testing and I completely agree... Not only are students less likely to read for pleasure in school, but they are required to prepare to read from a standardized test. Where is the pleasure in that? I think technology could be a great tool for teachers and isn't the reason why students don't want to read. Most of the time that is what they are doing on the internet anyway, it just relates to them. This is why we need to help them see how print can also relate to them.

    ReplyDelete